<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Openbravo Manufacturing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourceerpguru.com/?p=761#comment-3408</guid>
		<description>Hi, Thanks for this review. 

I was looking for an Open source ERP suitable for small manufacturing. I installed Openbravo community edition v3.0 RC3 to evaluate it and realised that the MRP, Manufacturing and Project management modules are no longer available on community edition.

Small business (like me) use opensource because they can&#039;t afford the capital investment without knowing the business benefits. so I believe small manufacture business can&#039;t evaluate Openbravo&#039;s functionality (as they are less likely go for the professional edition to start with).

I don&#039;t want to investment on a product if it&#039;s not suitable for my business.

In my case, I would like to go for an opensource product to save my capital investment and if I find the product suitable for my business then, I will upgrade it to professional edition, mainly for support/upgrade. 

Hope this helps.

Deepak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Thanks for this review. </p>
<p>I was looking for an Open source ERP suitable for small manufacturing. I installed Openbravo community edition v3.0 RC3 to evaluate it and realised that the MRP, Manufacturing and Project management modules are no longer available on community edition.</p>
<p>Small business (like me) use opensource because they can&#8217;t afford the capital investment without knowing the business benefits. so I believe small manufacture business can&#8217;t evaluate Openbravo&#8217;s functionality (as they are less likely go for the professional edition to start with).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to investment on a product if it&#8217;s not suitable for my business.</p>
<p>In my case, I would like to go for an opensource product to save my capital investment and if I find the product suitable for my business then, I will upgrade it to professional edition, mainly for support/upgrade. </p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Deepak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Truax</title>
		<link>http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Truax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourceerpguru.com/?p=761#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>More details on that last note:

Here&#039;s a link to OpenBravo&#039;s Chief Technology Officer&#039;s blog post about the feature reduction: http://paolojuvara.blogspot.com/2010/09/easier-erp-deployment-why-simplified.html

He says it&#039;s to simplify the software to make it easier to adopt, but in the very roadmap document he references in the post - it also says: 

Premium features: features included in the core footprint but disabled in the Community Edition. The purpose of these features is to raise awareness among users of the existence and benefits of the Professional Edition and to provide incentives for its adoption.

That sounds a bit different than just making it easier to setup, which I&#039;m sure it accomplishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More details on that last note:</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to OpenBravo&#8217;s Chief Technology Officer&#8217;s blog post about the feature reduction: <a href="http://paolojuvara.blogspot.com/2010/09/easier-erp-deployment-why-simplified.html" rel="nofollow">http://paolojuvara.blogspot.com/2010/09/easier-erp-deployment-why-simplified.html</a></p>
<p>He says it&#8217;s to simplify the software to make it easier to adopt, but in the very roadmap document he references in the post &#8211; it also says: </p>
<p>Premium features: features included in the core footprint but disabled in the Community Edition. The purpose of these features is to raise awareness among users of the existence and benefits of the Professional Edition and to provide incentives for its adoption.</p>
<p>That sounds a bit different than just making it easier to setup, which I&#8217;m sure it accomplishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Truax</title>
		<link>http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Truax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourceerpguru.com/?p=761#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s NOT free anymore. If you check out the version 3.0 roadmap, you&#039;ll find that they are pulling the entire Manufacturing, MRP, and Project Management modules out of the community edition and making them into extensions that require the Profe$$ional Edition.

Now you&#039;re back to having to invest not just time, but money to see if it will work for your company like everything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s NOT free anymore. If you check out the version 3.0 roadmap, you&#8217;ll find that they are pulling the entire Manufacturing, MRP, and Project Management modules out of the community edition and making them into extensions that require the Profe$$ional Edition.</p>
<p>Now you&#8217;re back to having to invest not just time, but money to see if it will work for your company like everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RNA</title>
		<link>http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator>RNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 07:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourceerpguru.com/?p=761#comment-3362</guid>
		<description>@Ehab You can find the comparisons of OpenBravo and OpenERP at  http://www.evaluationmatrix.com/comparison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ehab You can find the comparisons of OpenBravo and OpenERP at  <a href="http://www.evaluationmatrix.com/comparison" rel="nofollow">http://www.evaluationmatrix.com/comparison</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehab</title>
		<link>http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourceerpguru.com/?p=761#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>How would you compare manufacturing of OpenBravo to OpenERP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you compare manufacturing of OpenBravo to OpenERP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alin Hanghiuc</title>
		<link>http://opensourceerpguru.com/2009/12/07/openbravo-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-3153</link>
		<dc:creator>Alin Hanghiuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourceerpguru.com/?p=761#comment-3153</guid>
		<description>Just a small note: &quot;Openbravo&quot; is misspelled as &quot;Opnebravo&quot; in the first paragraph.

Great site, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a small note: &#8220;Openbravo&#8221; is misspelled as &#8220;Opnebravo&#8221; in the first paragraph.</p>
<p>Great site, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

